PhaseMap is a python package I am trying to use, but the minimal working example in the tutorial isn't working: import phasemap as pm def phase(pos): x, y = pos return int(x**2 + y**2 < 1) res = pm.run( phase, limits=[(-1, 1), (-1, 1)], mesh=3, ) When I run this code (on Python 3.11.9), the following error is raised: File ~/Desktop/repos/non_linear_topological_invariants/nonlinear_topological_invariants/lib/python3.11/site-packages/phasemap-1.0.0-py3.11.egg/phasemap/_run.py:103, in run(fct, limits, mesh, num_steps, all_corners, init_result, save_file, load, load_quiet, serializer, save_interval) 90 else: 91 init_points = None 93 return _RunImpl( 94 fct=fct, 95 limits=limits, 96 mesh=mesh, 97 num_steps=num_steps, 98 all_corners=all_corners, 99 init_points=init_points, 100 save_file=save_file, 101 serializer=serializer, 102 save_interval=save_interval, --> 103 ).execute() File ~/Desktop/repos/non_linear_topological_invariants/nonlinear_topological_invariants/lib/python3.11/site-packages/phasemap-1.0.0-py3.11.egg/phasemap/_run.py:158, in _RunImpl.execute(self) 157 def execute(self): --> 158 self._loop.run_until_complete(self._run()) 159 return self.result File ~/.pyenv/versions/3.11.9/lib/python3.11/asyncio/base_events.py:630, in BaseEventLoop.run_until_complete(self, future) 619 """Run until the Future is done. 620 621 If the argument is a coroutine, it is wrapped in a Task. (...) 627 Return the Future's result, or raise its exception. 628 """ 629 self._check_closed() --> 630 self._check_running() 632 new_task = not futures.isfuture(future) 633 future = tasks.ensure_future(future, loop=self) File ~/.pyenv/versions/3.11.9/lib/python3.11/asyncio/base_events.py:589, in BaseEventLoop._check_running(self) 587 def _check_running(self): 588 if self.is_running(): --> 589 raise RuntimeError('This event loop is already running') 590 if events._get_running_loop() is not None: 591 raise RuntimeError( 592 'Cannot run the event loop while another loop is running') RuntimeError: This event loop is already running This seems like a straightforward issue with the implementation of the asyncio library, but I don't know how to fix it. Is there a straightforward fix to this package that will solve the issue? Thanks! Continue reading...