About performance & best practice Note, the entire code for the question below is public on Github. Feel free to check out the project! https://github.com/b-long/moose-dj-uv/pull/3 I'm trying to workout a simple Django + Dask integration, where one view starts a long-running process and another view is able to check the status of that work. Later on, I might enhance this in a way that get_task_status (or some other Django view function) is able to return the output of the work. I'm using time.sleep(2) to intentionally mimic a long-running bit of work. Also, it's important to see the overall work status as "running". To that end, I'm also using a time.sleep() in my test, which feels very silly. Here's the view code: from uuid import uuid4 from django.http import JsonResponse from dask.distributed import Client import time # Initialize Dask client client = Client(n_workers=8, threads_per_worker=2) NUM_FAKE_TASKS = 25 # Dictionary to store futures with task_id as key task_futures = {} def long_running_process(work_list): def task_function(task): time.sleep(2) return task futures = [client.submit(task_function, task) for task in work_list] return futures async def start_task(request): work_list = [] for t in range(NUM_FAKE_TASKS): task_id = str(uuid4()) # Generate a unique ID for the task work_list.append( {"address": f"foo--{t}@example.com", "message": f"Mail task: {task_id}"} ) futures = long_running_process(work_list) dask_task_id = futures[0].key # Use the key of the first future as the task ID # Store the futures in the dictionary with task_id as key task_futures[dask_task_id] = futures return JsonResponse({"task_id": dask_task_id}) async def get_task_status(request, task_id): futures = task_futures.get(task_id) if futures: if not all(future.done() for future in futures): progress = 0 return JsonResponse({"status": "running", "progress": progress}) else: results = client.gather(futures, asynchronous=False) # Calculate progress, based on futures that are 'done' progress = int((sum(future.done() for future in futures) / len(futures)) * 100) return JsonResponse( { "task_id": task_id, "status": "completed", "progress": progress, "results": results, } ) else: return JsonResponse({"status": "error", "message": "Task not found"}) I've written a test, which completes in about 5.5 seconds: from django.test import Client from django.urls import reverse import time def test_immediate_response_with_dask(): client = Client() response = client.post(reverse("start_task_dask"), data={"data": "foo"}) assert response.status_code == 200 assert "task_id" in response.json() task_id = response.json()["task_id"] response2 = client.get(reverse("get_task_status_dask", kwargs={"task_id": task_id})) assert response2.status_code == 200 r2_status = response2.json()["status"] assert r2_status == "running" attempts = 0 max_attempts = 8 while attempts < max_attempts: time.sleep(1) try: response3 = client.get( reverse("get_task_status_dask", kwargs={"task_id": task_id}) ) assert response3.status_code == 200 r3_status = response3.json()["status"] r3_progress = response3.json()["progress"] assert r3_progress >= 99 assert r3_status == "completed" break # Exit the loop if successful except Exception: attempts += 1 if attempts == max_attempts: raise # Raise the last exception if all attempts failed My question is, is there a more performant way to implement this same API? What if NUM_FAKE_TASKS = 10000? Am I wasting cycles? Edit: How to view progress percentage? Thanks to @GuillaumeEB for the tip. So, we know that the following is blocking: client.gather(futures, asynchronous=False) But, it seems like this also doesn't behave the way expect: client.gather(futures, asynchronous=True) Is there some way that I could use client.persist() or client.compute(), to see incremental progress? I know that I can't persist a list of <class 'distributed.client.Future'> , and using client.compute(futures) also seems to behave incorrectly (jumping the progress from 0 to 100). Continue reading...